I am starting this topic for any older or new discovery be pondered by people do not believe in code.
Please read all post and tell me : Is that Right?
Everything is under control and presence of all of us on this screen is part of our destination.
Pro and anti code 19 opinion clears up the path for truth to reach conclusion faster.
My claim in following is part of these attempt and your responsible, simple, detailed response welcome
The following is last part of my last work that few portions of those has been posted here earlier.
Completing this topic would be my first priority which either be succeeded or fails it would be the end of my discussion on this screen as I will spend time on many other things left infant..
Few weeks ago Dear Khizer finding of new pattern same as table 23 was not end of my search and vision toward that table. Divisibility of this table by code even having numeral probability can not be coincidence when Rashad was not aware of such pattern in his claim but insisting correctness of numbers in his publications.
Khizer finding was leading me to new stage of searching for truth in that table:
We have 2 sets of number 1-114 one fixed and next variable .
Let us make easier and fixed as A and variable one B
Then we have only 2 trails
AB
or
BA
Either pattern can have numeral probability but Rashad;s claim matches with one of those numeral without calculation or programming to find such pattern.
Divisibility of 2 set of 114 with total of 468 digits by code 19 when directly eplains the sequence of chapter revealed ) without programming can not be coincidence. (700 billions has 12 digits
Finding probability using computer for those who know the programs is fast and easy but I do not know how easy is designing a pattern with 468 digits multiple of 19 when the numbers are set of one 2 or 3 digits.
Such vision that this divisibility can not be coincidence challenged me to look further and deeper how this table can be locked and sealed and be the only one.
The new search proved that if a text be inserted into pattern it could lock it and can not be changed to have another divisible pattern.
Simpler my name is Bahman in Arabic 2 a is not shown and only 3 letters having value B=2 H=5 M=40 and N=50
My digital name is 254050
I use code 19 for example here
And above number is not multiple of 19
By adding random numbers in front and end to make it and just changing last number a pattern of multiple of 19 can be found easily.
23654876254050987641
then by adding or deducting 19 number we can go to minimum 19 or highest to infinite multiple of 19. But when we reach by deducting tp254050we can not change it as will change the text and my name will change to some thing different.
Those random numbers can be relocated but it can not be done with fixed numbers like those in table 23 .
here we can not add or deduct 19 and have another pattern as the numbers are sets linked to each other small one variable (order) large ( chapter)
so 114 can not be changed to +19=133 when there is no chapter 133. and deducting 19 would be 95 which is wrong and last chapter is 114.
19 cycle do apply here.
But the small one can be relocated and by programming ( I do not know)numeral pattern can be found
Solution is inserting text digits, not my name but verses from book, no external source as 19 is only for book.
A message to its meaning to be linked to table existence. I can not exactly when and how I remembered that I had posted somewhere verse about tablet. Prase be to God for such technology that these screen is my best assistant and company from doing banking to shopping , news and here too.
Simple search 85:21-22 :

My understanding is that this is the only pattern with 85:21-22 digital text .
Is that right?
Peace.




